Thirteen publishers won a $19.5 million default judgment against WeLib on November 9, adding a copyright-enforcement victory against a site they alleged offered pirated material to AI developers.
U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero entered the judgment in Apress Media, LLC et al. v. WeLib and Does 1-10, in the Southern District of New York. The signed order awards damages for direct, willful copyright infringement after the defendants failed to defend the case. This was a default judgment, not a contested trial verdict.
The Association of American Publishers said the award covers 130 works at $150,000 each. Plaintiffs include Penguin Random House, HarperCollins, Elsevier and other book, journal and educational publishers.
The order requires destruction of unauthorized copies and directs domain registries, registrars and hosting providers, upon notice, to disable specified infrastructure and stop hosting the infringing sites. An order to act does not establish that access has already ended or damages have been collected.
The AI connection—and the limit
AAP says publishers alleged WeLib marketed high-speed access to its repository to AI model developers. That allegation connects the case to the supply of training material; it is not a finding that a particular developer trained a model on these works.
For media rights holders, the practical angle is enforcement against the source of unauthorized copies. The judgment does not resolve AI-training fair use, derivative-output infringement or technological-circumvention claims. Nor does it establish a licensing price for AI use.
The court retains enforcement jurisdiction. RNN has not independently verified compliance or any subsequent appeal.
Related coverage: Grok developers face three new book-copyright lawsuits.